Prediction of Markus Eriksson vs Daniel Glancy Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Eriksson vs D. Glancy

Markus Eriksson
SWE
l
l
l
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
35
Age
37
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
277
Best Rank
718
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$500
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Daniel Glancy
IRL
w
l
w
w
l
l
w
w
w
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
35
Age
37
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
277
Best Rank
718
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$500
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Eriksson 2 - 0 Glancy
They have played 6 sets in total, with Markus Eriksson winning 4 and Daniel Glancy winning 2. The last match between Markus Eriksson and Daniel Glancy was at the Greece F4, 01-11-2010, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Markus Eriksson getting the victory 6-4 4-6 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Eriksson | 2 |
| Glancy | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Greece F4(11-01-10)
Markus Eriksson
6
4
6
Daniel Glancy
4
6
4
(R1) Latvia F1(08-16-10)
Markus Eriksson
7
1
6
Daniel Glancy
5
6
3
M. Eriksson vs D. Glancy H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $500 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.64% (405-310) | Career Total W/L | 42.96% (119-158) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 10 | Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Eriksson vs D. Glancy Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Markus Eriksson has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Daniel Glancy has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Markus Eriksson, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Daniel Glancy has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Markus Eriksson has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Daniel Glancy has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Markus Eriksson has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Daniel Glancy winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Markus Eriksson has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 258/182), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 75/68). Daniel Glancy has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 49/56), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 37/59).
- Player level: In the last year, Markus Eriksson has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Daniel Glancy has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Markus Eriksson winning 2 times and Daniel Glancy being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Markus Eriksson winning 4 and Daniel Glancy winning 2.
- The last match between Markus Eriksson and Daniel Glancy was at the Greece F4, 01-11-2010, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Markus Eriksson getting the victory 6-4 4-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Markus Eriksson has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Daniel Glancy has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Markus Eriksson has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Daniel Glancy has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Markus Eriksson has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Daniel Glancy has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Markus Eriksson vs Daniel Glancy Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Eriksson vs D. Glancy H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 30 | Games Won | 28 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Eriksson 0%, Glancy 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Eriksson 0%, Glancy 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Eriksson 0%, Glancy 0%.
M. Eriksson Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
QF | W | 6-0 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 6-0 2-0 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 7-5 | ||
D. Glancy Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q3 | L | 3-6 6-1 4-0 ret. | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||

M. Eriksson vs D. Glancy Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.64% (405/310) | YTD Win/Loss | 42.96% (119/158) |
| 55.14% (922/750) | Sets Win/Loss | 43.62% (270/349) |
| 52.48% (8166/7395) | Games Win/Loss | 47.98% (2698/2925) |
| 54.96% (72/59) | Hard Win/Loss | 46.67% (49/56) |
| 58.64% (258/182) | Clay Win/Loss | 38.54% (37/59) |
| 52.08% (75/69) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43.42% (33/43) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 1228 | Aces Total | 47 |
| 0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.04 |
| 675 | Total Double Faults | 100 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 612.34 | Average Opponent Rank | 545.2 |
| 64% (18685/29266) | 1st Serve % | 58% (1006/1743) |
| 67% (12480/18685) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (600/1006) |
| 51% (5371/10581) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (334/737) |
| 43% (1336/3116) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 34% (47/137) |
| 41% (11988/29166) | Return Points Win % | 34% (548/1596) |
| 43.75% (7/9) | Cups W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 5.00% (1/19) | Main Tour W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 53.33% (80/70) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (8/16) |
| 59.92% (317/212) | Futures W/L | 44.86% (109/134) |
| 57% (395/696) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (116/269) |
| 50% (8/16) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 51% (98/193) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 41% (31/75) |
| 52% (115/221) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (33/66) |
| 86% (391/337) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (118/103) |
| 14% (391/54) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (118/15) |
| 21% (324/68) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (158/15) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Fri, 21 Nov, 06:30 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 05:00 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 06:00 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 12:35 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 11:35 AM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 12:05 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Sydney Challenger Preview And Prediction: James McCabe vs Rinky Hijikata Betting Tips & Picks November 21, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Bennemann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Bergamo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Mark Lajal vs Justin Engel Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Jaume Antoni Munar Clar vs Jiri Lehecka Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ESP – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →LP Open by IND – Colina Preview And Prediction: Laura Pigossi vs Leolia Jeanjean Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025
Top Predictions Today
04:10
H2H 1-1
14:00
H2H 1-0
20:00
H2H 0-1
12:05
H2H 0-0
15:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal